Standards and evaluative criteria

Cover of: Standards and evaluative criteria | North Carolina. Dept. of Community Colleges

Published by Dept. of Community Colleges, State Board of Education in Raleigh, N. C .

Written in English

Read online

Subjects:

  • Community colleges -- North Carolina -- Accreditation,
  • Community colleges -- North Carolina -- Evaluation,
  • Technical education -- North Carolina -- Evaluation

Book details

The Physical Object
Paginationiii, 54 p. ;
Number of Pages54
ID Numbers
Open LibraryOL14533377M

Download Standards and evaluative criteria

The book is well organized, taking the reader from understanding Common Criteria and the process to preparing for an evaluation (developing a business case, allocating resources, and managing the scope of the evaluation) to running the project to finalization/5(3). is a platform for academics to share research papers.

The Accreditation Handbook includes the rules of procedure by which CAPTE operates, the Evaluative Criteria, CAPTE's position papers and other information regarding the candidacy and accreditation processes.

The criteria are also used beyond evaluation for monitoring and results – management, and for strategic planning and intervention design. They can be used to look at processes (how change happens) as well as results (what changed).

All criteria can be used to evaluate before, during or after an intervention   Michael Scriven’s Logic of Evaluation uses the term ‘standards in a different way – it begins by identifying evaluative criteria (aspects of performance), and then criteria (levels of performance), and then collecting evidence of performance and synthesizing it.

Efficiency (CIGIE) “shall adhere to professional standards developed by the Council” (§ 11(c)(2) of the IG Act). In JuneCIGIE Reform officially adopted the “Quality Standards for Inspections” as the professional standards for all inspection and evaluation work Standards and evaluative criteria book by member organizations.

The Program Evaluation Standards book (Yahrough et al., ). The standards’ names and statements are reproduced below in checklist form with permission of the Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation (JC SEE).

The purpose of this checklist version of the Standards is to provide evaluation. Government Auditing Standards (The Yellow Book ~ ) Quality Standards for Digital Forensics () Quality Standards for Investigations () Quality Standards for Inspection and Evaluation (The Blue Book ~ ) Quality Standards for Federal Offices of Inspector General (The Silver Book ~ ) Quality Standards for Digital Forensics.

evaluation questions and a proposal for answering them in a practical, meaningful sequence, with actions and decisions in mind. We cannot evaluate everything, so we choose strategically. Several criteria guide decisions about where to put our evaluation dollars, including the.

The standards are recommended as criteria for judging the quality of program evaluation efforts in public health. The 30 standards are organized into the following four groups: Utility standards ensure that an evaluation will serve the information needs of intended users. Evaluation procedures and process.

Typically, the evaluation process and procedures (details of factors that will be considered in the assessment, evaluation team composition, mechanics for evaluation as an individual assessment versus a collective assessment or in groups, and so on) are not described in the RFP beyond the methodology inherent to the criteria, and the weighting and scoring.

Authored by a master writer and evaluator, Standards-Based and Responsive Evaluation explores the many conceptual choices an evaluator needs to make when doing an evaluation, devoting attention to stakeholders, weighing ethical risks, and writing a useful report. Evaluation Standards The development and use of standards is the key to uniform application of evaluation criteria.

Standards establish the minimum level of acceptability for a requirement and provide the basis on which the ratings above and below the. The following requirements govern the Bid/Proposal evaluation criteria: a) the evaluation criteria shall be proportionate and appropriate to the type, nature, market conditions, complexity, risk, value and objective of what is being procured; b) to the extent practicable, evaluation criteria should be quantifiable (such as.

The reason why these colleagues are at odds in their evaluation of is not because they disagree about the facts, but because they are prioritising different evaluation criteria.

Teacher 1’s evaluation (It’s great!) is based on the administrative efficiency of the changes. Teacher 2’s evaluation (It’s a mess!) is based on the impact on.

I am pleased to provide the new evaluation system standards that were developed as part of the implementation of the revised regulations at 5 CFR Partsubpart B, which went into effect April 7, The new standards were developed by an interagency working group of 23 representatives from various agencies and 15 representatives from OPM.

The third edition of the Program Evaluation Standards was published in The six-year development process relied on formal and informal needs assessments; reviews of existing scholarship; and the involvement of more than stakeholders in national and international reviews, field trials, and national hearings.

Evaluative Criteria of an English Language Textbook Evaluation Checklist Article (PDF Available) in Journal of Language Teaching and Research 3(6) June w Reads. In the evaluative book review, these two streams—an accurate reading and a strong response—come together, for the reviewer should indicate what is in the book and what the contents might mean to a reader.

The reviewer's own reaction reveals to the book buyer the potential of. These criteria, procedures, and general standards, adopted by the Campus Faculty and approved by the Chancellor and President, apply to implementation on the Fayetteville campus of Board of Trustees Policy They are also designed to reflect the following statement of.

the checklist to evaluate both print and non-print learning materials, such as books, workbooks, video collections, software, and websites. How was the Checklist for Evaluating Learning Materials developed.

The following six principles guided the development of the OALCF: 1. Evaluative criteria. [National Study of Secondary School Evaluation.] -- The major concern of the National Study of Secondary School Evaluation is to determine the traits of good secondary schools and to develop improved methods of evaluation of schools.

Note: Citations are based on reference standards. However, formatting rules can vary. The Standards aim to improve the quality and use of M&E products, and to integrate evaluative thinking into everyday work.

The Standards were integrated into DFAT's Department-wide evaluation guidance in and provide a strong tool for the articulation of DFAT's expectations of the quality expected from a range of M&E products.

While a variety of approaches among textbooks is desirable, satisfactory texts at every level meet certain criteria. The most important guideline, from which more specific criteria follow, is the need to make sure that the text contributes to good history instruction and adheres to scholarly standards.

Fortunately, the Council of Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency (CIGIE) has established Quality Standards for Inspection and Evaluation, also known as the Blue Book, to provide a framework for inspections and evaluation work by Federal Offices of Inspector General (OIG).

This framework can be applied to all organizations performing program evaluations. In the following sections you will learn about criteria for evaluating reference sources. After the self-evaluation is a discussion of general criteria for all formats, an explanation of the parts of a book, and then a discussion of criteria for specific formats – print and electronic.

The Council of Chief State School Officers (CCSSO)’s Criteria for Procuring and Evaluating High-Quality Chapter 1 in David Squires’s book Aligning and Balancing the Standards-Based Curriculum1, first defines curriculum, then examines alignment approaches that schools can use to address the interrelated nature of standards, assessment.

Book Description Standards for the Preparation of Literacy Professionals (Standards ) sets forth the criteria for developing and evaluating preparation programs for literacy professionals. The criteria for compliance within each standard reflect what programs must do to achieve a particular level, move from one level to the next, or earn points in a specific category of standards.

The criteria vary widely from state to state. These two resources provide an overview and links to state QRIS standards.

Because most books contained a section discussing evaluative criteria, we identified and read this section, and prepared notes in the manner described above for journal articles and book chapters. An early observation was that not all publications offered explicit criteria.

Publications offering explicit evaluative criteria were treated as a group. Documents such as the National Computer Security Center's (NCSC's) Trusted Computer System Evaluation Criteria (TCSEC, or Orange Book; U.S.

DOD, d) and its Trusted Network Interpretation (TNI, or Red Book; U.S. DOD, ), and the harmonized Information Technology Security Evaluation Criteria (ITSEC; Federal Republic of Germany, ) of France, Germany, the Netherlands, and the.

Methodological Brief No Evaluative Criteria Page 3 Main points Evaluative criteria specify the values that will be used in an evaluation of interventions (i.e., programmes and policies).

UNICEF uses a range of evaluative criteria to guide its evaluations; not all of them are used in. Evaluation Standards for Latin America and the Caribbean () - The evaluation standards for Latin America and the Caribbean were developed by a task force of the Latin American and Caribbean Network of Evaluation (ReLAC).

They are available in Espagnol, Português and English. Effective program evaluation is a systematic way to improve and account for public health actions by involving procedures that are useful, feasible, ethical, and accurate. The Framework for Evaluation in Public Health [1] guides public health professionals in their use of program evaluation.

It is a practical, nonprescriptive tool, designed to. Six Criteria for Evaluating State-Level Education Policies Education reform policies are more likely to achieve their goals if they are fair to all legitimate stakeholders, respect schools' organizational integrity, link ends and means realistically, are consistent with other state actions, are cost effective, and are politically achievable.

Evaluation Criteria for Written Work The following general evaluation criteria apply to written assignments in an academic setting. The criteria represent general standard guidelines for evaluating written assignments.

PLEASE NOTE: These standards only represent general criteria and do not mean essays will automatically earn a certain grade. Teaching In Virginia Performance & Evaluation. The Board of Education is responsible for establishing teacher, principal and superintendent guidelines including performance standards and evaluation criteria to assist school divisions in implementing educator evaluation systems.

The Rainbow Series of Department of Defense standards is outdated, out of print, and provided here for historical purposes ONLY. The following is only a partial list--a more complete collection is available from the Federation of American Scientists: DoD STD 'Orange Book', DoD Trusted Computer System Evaluation Criteria (Decem ) CSC-STD 'Green Book', DoD.

1) Core evaluation criteria for Bachelor of Science in Nursing students’ application of evidence-based practice during clinical experiences have not been established. 2) There is a limited understanding of what type of factors, if any, are reported by nursing faculty evidence-based practice experts when undertaking the evaluation of Bachelor of.

Performance & Evaluation Teachers Board of Education Teacher Performance Standards & Evaluation Criteria. Guidelines for Uniform Performance Standards and Evaluation Criteria for Teachers-This is a Word document. (Word) – Approved by the Virginia Board of Education on Apeffective July 1,and revised on Jand Janu.

These thirty standards support the core attributes of evaluation quality: utility, feasibility, propriety, accuracy, and accountability, and provide guidance to anyone interested in planning, implementing, or using program evaluations.

The book is an invaluable resource for practicing evaluators, students, evaluation users, and clients.standards by independent but authorized and accredited organizations. Security assessment is a less formal security evaluation practice, but equally important in that it provides a mechanism by which vendors independently assess their products’ security-worthiness, although not against formal evaluation criteria and/or standards.and associated criteria (e.g., spikes, replicates, blanks), and tests to verify the method’s evaluation-standards/program evaluation- standards-statements).

Evaluation plan (an example) Overview. Because of the scope and nature of this XXX project, the project team will .

24143 views Sunday, November 8, 2020